The problem with
a new Star Wars movie that takes place after the end of the original trilogy is
that so much of the story has been filled in already. How can you make a movie
that respects all of the story elements, characters, political development,
alien races, et cetera, that are now considered Star Wars canon? You can’t.
With nearly every choice the Star Wars Episode VII film crew make, they will be
upsetting several Star Wars fans. The most frustrating thing about this is that
the fans you will be upsetting more than most are the lifelong Star Wars fans.
I’m talking about the fans that have read some books and played some of the
video games. It’s those very same fans that introduce younger generations to
the many galaxies of Star Wars. They are the lifeblood of the franchise. Casual
fans or people who have seen the movies a couple of times will probably be less
disappointed because their criteria for a good Star Wars movie are more
relaxed. Spaceships, Jedi Knights, lightsaber battles, some dude talking funny, all of which
happening to a John
Williams score, they’ll be happy. They’ll probably enjoy new movies but
only just as much as any other space opera film with laser guns and spaceship
battles.
The fact that
George Lucas won’t be involved will also have an impact. Say what you want
about Lucas, he’s still the guy that created Star Wars, including all good and
bad elements to be found in the movies. More importantly, the visuals of Star
Wars are integral to Lucas’s participation in making the movies. Without him,
who will say yay or nay to new designs and story elements? Say what you want
about some of his decisions in the past, he has a profound understanding of all
things Star Wars. Most importantly, Lucas is a visual storyteller. The dialogue
in Star Wars is nothing spectacular and, quite often, it’s borderline terrible.
The visuals matter more than anything else. In the prequel trilogy, the story
barely even mattered.
One of my other
concerns is the Disneyfication the Star Wars universe. Star Wars will never be
considered serious science fiction, there is too much of a swashbuckler
influence to the franchise, which is apt, considering the Robin Hood influence
on the original trilogy. But there was a shift in Episode III towards a
distinctly more juvenile story. Check out this link if you don’t believe.
An article on Film Threat extrapolates, point by point, just what I’m referring too better
than I ever could have. I don’t agree
with the whole list, but it does a good job of pointing out some of the reasons
that influenced the difference in tone of Return of the Jedi compared to
Episode IV and V.
Lucas shifted
the tone back to something that is truer to Episode I and II in the prequel
trilogy. Sure, I’ll definitively agree that there are several points of
contention to be had with the prequels, but there big brush strokes, the larger
story and the thematic importance, are all there. I believe that will be the
greatest shortcomings in
Episode VII and beyond. This is also missing in some parts of the Expanded Universe
which seems to have embraced the swashbuckling more than any other aspect of
Star Wars (that’s not entire true. The novels tend to focus one a few elements
of the movies and expand on them, few, from what I’ve read anyway, have dealt
with all the star wars elements in a cohesive whole while providing the reader
with interesting themes or character arcs).
J.J. Abrams at
the helm also worries me. Like many others I really like the latest Star Trek
movies but it’s not a Star Trek movie. It’s a Star Wars movie pretending to be
a Star Trek movie. It’s all lasers and crazy space action. Where are the
interesting human and alien exchanges of culture? Where are the philosophical
and moral discussions based on problems the crew of the Enterprise are facing? The little bits of
Spock questioning his identity don’t count because it’s something we’ve seen
quite a few times before. If Abrams can’t even keep some of the most defining
elements of Star Trek in his movie, how is he going to keep the
difficult-to-pin down elements that make up a great Star Wars movie? Not only
that, but we already have an Abrams space opera movie and a sequel! Why do I
want more of the same? Challenge me as a moviegoer and offer me a Star Wars
movie I haven’t already seen before. I don’t want a rehash of previous movies
and I don’t want a diluted movie that panders to the most juvenile person
sitting in the theatre and I don’t all my science fiction to be filtered
through Abrams and I don’t want an R2D2 spin-off à la Wall-E.
You know what? Maybe I don’t want another Star Wars movie at all. Strangely
enough, as soon as I typed that I was a bit sad at the thought of never seeing
another Star Wars movie. What’s the solution here? Could it be the one-off Star
Wars movies we’ve heard rumours of? There might be far more potential for good
movie that focuses on one already established characters than there is with a
new trilogy that follows the end of Return of the Jedi. What do you think? What
are you concerns with new Star Wars movie and how would you address them?
One final note:
have you seen the redesigned of Merida from Brave before Disney inducted
her as the 11th Disney Princess? That’s the sort of nonsense I’ve
come to expect from Disney. For more on that, check out this great web comic
from Dork Tower.Nothing more needs to be said on that
subject. Expect a ridiculous Disneyfied Star Wars Universe that will suck.
Oh jeez, I will have nightmares of stormtroopers wearing Mickey Mouse ears. I truly hope Disney doesn't become the Death Star and destroy the Star Wars franchise as if it were Alderaan!
ReplyDeleteThere, a good nerdy reference in a comment lol. ;)