I read Myriam’s reread review before it went up on Shared Universe
Reviews and I was delighted to see she wrote different things than I did about
the first book. There were, of course, some similarities but as always,
different people can like the same thing for different reasons. For the purpose
of my post, I’ll focus on the differences between my appreciation of Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone
than Myriam.
One of the great things about rereading a series,
especially a fantasy or science fiction series where world building plays a
considerable role, is seeing old things with a new perspective. It can be a
double edged sword however because world building is something that’s done
progressively and sometimes things from earlier on in the series won’t always
match up seamlessly with some of the later novels. It’s more problematic for
some series and less for others but I have to admit, that Philosopher’s Stone being J. K. Rowling’s first published work, it
holds up pretty darn well to a sober second look.
