I was torn while
reading Dragonflight, Anne
McCaffrey’s first novel in her acclaimed and popular Dragonriders of Pern series. I felt very similar while reading Dragonquest as McCaffrey’s follow up to
the first successful novel is simultaneously better and worse. There’s a pretty
simple reason for this. McCaffrey expands on nearly everything that was present
in the first book. That includes the good as well as the bad. I admit that I
enjoyed the second book more simply because the focus was widened considerably.
In my review of Dragonflight I wrote the following:
Everything is structured based on dragons and their importance to the survival of Pern. What's interesting is that the threat of Thread occurs regularly but with a significant amount of time between each occurrence that Pernese tradition and culture relaxes and changes. Cultural changes aren’t necessarily a bad thing in our world. Modern life becomes increasingly complex as time passes and change is inevitable. In the world of Pern however, too much change to tradition can lead to the destruction of the human colony. The organization of the Weyrs and Holds was such as to protect mankind.
The
transformation of modern Pernese culture is one of the main themes of Dragonquest. The book begins with a
prologue in which McCaffrey gives the reader a pretty good look at the history
of Pern from the point of view of the original settlers. It includes their
initial encounter with Thread and their development of their defences against
it. We learn quite a bit from this prologue and it contributes to the world
building of Pern, mostly by providing historical information. More importantly,
we learn that dragons were genetically engineered and developed with the help
of human empaths. The Weyrs were built in extinct volcanoes which explain their
bowl-like shape. This is the time in Pern’s history were tradition regarding
the defence against Thread were shaped. The story of Dragonquest focuses on the transformation of traditions established
centuries ago.
At the end of Dragonflight Lessa travelled 400 turns
(years) into the past and when she returned to the present day she was
accompanied by five Weyrs’ full of dragonmen. These dragonmen are known as the
Oldtimers and they’re having a difficult time adjusting to modern life. They
agreed to travel to the future in order to help in part because they were bored
now that threadfall had ended in their timeline. Fighting Thread was what they
did and without their regular battles against the spores of the Red Star, the
Oldtimers had nothing to do. Now that they’re in Lessa and F’lar’s present
time, their dislike of the changed traditions is making them bitter and
difficult to deal with. Likewise, the existing Lord Holders of Pern are having
a difficult time adjusting to the custom of giving their Weyr a tithe as
repayment for protecting them during threadfall. They’ve never had to do that
before and the Lord Holders are continuously putting pressure on the Weyrs,
particularly Benden Weyr, to find a permanent solution and end the problem of
Thread once and for all.
Because Lessa
and F’lar of Benden Weyr did a great deal of work to protect their planet in
the first book of the series, most of Pern’s population is now looking at them
to continue to protect them. It's interesting that Benden Weyr would not relish
the opportunity to consult the Oldtimers on traditions, the care of dragons,
the political and economic structure of the Weyrs and Holds and the fight
against Thread. Many, many different things have changed in the last 400 years instead
of the present day people learning from the Oldtimers’ experience and the
Oldtimers learning about the new traditional elements and social structure of
the future, both groups just clash. It’s ok for a couple of reasons. The first
is that without this conflict between both groups of people there would be very
little other conflict in the book. The second reason is that if you tried to
look at the situation realistically, based on how two different social and
culture groups behave in opposition in the real world, this outcome is to be
expected. The issue now though is that F’lar and many others, refuse to consult
the Oldtimers on how they did things and simply continue to make it up as they
go along. Similarly, the Oldtimers refuse to accept that traditions change.
Lessa and Mnementh by John Schoenherr |
The focus of the
novel is still on world building. The conflict with the Oldtimers and the Lord
Holders that began in the first novel gets a whole novel to itself (Dragonquest) to allow for the conflict
to play out. As such, Dragonriders of
Pern isn’t a typical fantasy novel because there aren’t traditional elements
such as a quest (despite the title) or a clearly identified villain. The book
is essentially world building through narrative storytelling. The focus is on
developing the world and some elements work really well and others don’t. An
example of an element that worked well is the Red Star. It’s played out in a
very enjoyable way and even though this is an old book I don’t want to say any
more than that. McCaffrey could have written the Red Star sub-plot in so many
different ways and, for a while during the book, I was worried she’d get it
wrong but she sticks the landing. It’s one of my favourite parts of the book.
Other elements of the book like time travel and characters, simply don’t work
nearly as well.
Time travel
wasn’t originally part of McCaffrey’s series but when her editor on Dragonflight suggested she include it,
she liked the idea so much it became a pivotal element of her stories. I found
it to be a copout, a quick fix ending to the first novel but there aren’t any
huge time jumps in Dragonquest. It’s
still used regularly but it’s mostly to time jump back to the beginning of a
threadfall. If time travel continues to be used this way, I’ll get over it.
It’s not ideal because it makes surviving threadfall that much easier. If they
miss some they can just travel back to where it began. If McCaffrey wrote about
the mental and physical strain of time travel (fantasy jetlag) on dragonriders
I would appreciate it more but as it is written, it’s one of the weaker world
building elements.
It seems strange
to me that McCaffrey has her characters deal with the Weyrs’ isolation politics
with a technological solution. They have the capabilities to communicate
rapidly by using dragons and going between
(space and time travel) but for reasons that are never quite explained,
Dragonriders are extremely reluctant to do so. Instead some Weyrs and Holds use
a system of drums and drummers to communicate. There also isn’t a whole lot of
details of this. From what I understand there are drummers and located at
intervals between Holds and Weyrs. That seems unlikely though because the
combination of isolation and the threat of Thread probably make for a dangerous
situation. Fandarel, a builder, develops what is essentially a telegraph but it
works without electricity. I think it’s strange that Fandarel develops or
redevelops a lot of technological solutions to some of the population’s
problems over the course of the book. I understand why a lot of technology was
lost and that Thread forces the people to spend more time developing way to
survive than they were able to give to focusing on other things like renewable
energy, refining raw materials and developing sustainable technology. I guess
that the use of technology in this book kind of exemplifies the contradictions
present in a world where traditional science fiction and traditional fantasy
elements are two side of the same coin. It think it also serves as an example
that increasing the scope of your world building can leave entire sections of
your work underdeveloped.
The other big
problems, similarly to Dragonflight,
is gender roles and characters. The gender roles are as disturbing in this book
as they are in Dragonflight. F'nor
reflects on the roles and activities of women in the Weyr. In short, they're
constantly occupied providing for the Weyr and the dragonriders by making
numbweed salve, treating wounds and other similarly domestic functions. This
keeps then active, in shape and as F'nor reflects "appealing". The
women in the lower caverns are there for the picking when dragonmen want sex.
As demonstrated in the first book, if a woman becomes pregnant it’s not
uncommon for a dragonrider to abandon her and move on. Women in the Holds have
a different job to do. They're responsible for giving birth and raising
children until their bodies no longer allows them to do so. It's unsettling way
in which Pernese society is structured. It’s structured in such a way as to
allow for their survival but that structure is done at the detriment of women
who are reduced to manual labourers, tools of sexual pleasure and baby making.
I recommend clicking on the image and making it bigger. It's a great cover by Michael Whelan. |
Is there no such
thing as a familial structure in Pernese society? I couldn't find a definitive
answer to this question in the first two books. It's odd though that five Weyrs
full of dragonriders (five or six Weyrs?) agreed to travel 400 years into the
future where they will permanently reside; a decision they made nearly
instantly. There I no way such a large number of individuals would have done
that if they had families. The Dragonriders
of Pern series is so cold and emotionless. Maybe being bonded to a dragon
makes it near impossible to maintain an amorous human relationship that would
lead to children and family life. It’s odd that Lessa and F’lar have a child but
they don’t spend any time with him at all. He kind of wanders around the Weyr
while mom and dad, Pern’s power couple, take care of business. Maybe family
life is something McCaffrey explores in later books. I don't know. I'll have to
read them. The absence of a strong familial structure would also explain the
absence of surnames.
Overall, the
characters of Dragonquest are fine on
the surface. Some of them even manage to be interesting but as soon as
McCaffrey starts to develop relationship between characters everything goes to
shit. Some characters, primarily Kylara, seem to be in the book only to be used
for slut shaming and to demonstrate the complicated, odd and often time
disturbing gender politics of Pern. When she becomes pregnant early on in the
novel, she travels between where the
incredible cold of teleportation kills the child in her womb. It’s
teleportation abortion and free of any motherly responsibility, she can
continue to be as promiscuous as she likes. She’s one of the most problematic
characters in the book. She’s had five children at this point and she’s
determined not to have any more. She’s mean spirited about it though and she
regularly uses her dragon’s ability to fly between
as a fantasy and science fiction method of the morning after pill. There are no
contraceptives on Pern and the only way to prevent unwanted pregnancies is to
be abstinent which Kylara refuses to be. Instead, she takes matters into her
own hands when she becomes pregnant. It's very unfortunate that the one pro-choice
female character in Dragonquest is
also characterized as a slut that revels in engaging with whomever she wants
whenever she wants.
Lessa and F’nor
have change for the better since Dragonflight
but their comments towards the behaviour of others (again, Kylara) suggests
they’re also poised for problematic character development in the next book. I
liked that F’nor got a larger role in this book than the previous one. I also
enjoyed his budding romantic relationship with Brekke, the rider of a gold
dragon, up to the point where their first romantic encounter was turned into a
scene of romanticized rape. The only characters I like without reservation are
secondary or background characters. Robinton, the Masterharper of Pern is one
such character. I also quite liked Manora, the Headwoman of Benden Weyr but she
doesn’t get to do much and works mostly in the background.
That’s a lot of problems to deal with but, somehow, McCaffrey’s Dragonriders of Pern series still manages to be interesting and enjoyable to me. It’s not always enjoyable to read, certain passages make for uncomfortable reads, but the series often provides food for thought.The problem is that there isn’t really anything I love unabashedly about the series. Any recommendation I would make of this book would come with a disclaimer and a few words of caution. There are pacing issues (there are a lot of people standing around talking), problematic gender politics and characters that are interested but flawed due to a single or small handful of character moments that just ruin them for me. I also have a few point of content with McCaffrey’s writing in general. Despite all these problems I can’t help but be swept away by the world she’s created. When I think at the world, the dragons and the history of Pern, I’m very interested in all of those things and I think they make for a fascinating setting for stories. When I look at the characters, I like them from afar and I only dislike them when I spent too much time in their heads or watching them shame others and take part in unsavoury actions. I like it and I dislike it! Thankfully, I am able to communicate why certain things bother while also being able to separate the implications of some of the elements found in Dragonquest from my enjoyment of all the different things that work. I will be revisiting Pern again but I think I need a little break from all the insanity that takes place there.
No comments:
Post a Comment