I’ve known
about Andy Weir’s book, The Martian,
since its hardcover publication in early 2014. It had a bright reddish orange
cover that made the book standout on the shelves. I bought a copy late last
year when it was published in paperback and it took me until August to finally
sit down and read it. In that time I didn’t absorb any of the book’s contents
other than what was included on the back cover. As always, I’m only getting
around to reading the book several months later but dammit, there are too many
books and so little time. Thankfully the trailer for Ridley Scott’s film
adaptation lit a fire under me and I snatched the book from off the shelf.
Weir’s first outing as a published author caught me by surprise. He deserves
the praise he’s received so far, but I also think he deserves a better editor
and an opportunity to tell a refine his craft and tell a different kind of story,
something that will allow him to spread his wings and improve as an author.
Anybody
taking the time to read this is probably familiar with the story. Astronaut
Mark Watney gets stranded on Mars after the crew he’s on is forced to terminate
their expedition. Left behind on an unforgiving planet, he has to find a way to
survive several hundred days and travel several thousand miles over very rough
terrain in order to be rescued. The problems are many, he doesn’t have nearly
enough food to survive so long and all of his equipment wasn’t designed to last
beyond a few weeks or operate in the way he’ll have to use them in order to
stay alive. The odds are certainly not in his favour but Watney has one
advantage. As a botanist and a mechanical engineer, he has science on his side.
Add to this that he has far more time than he knows what to do with (boredom is
one of his many struggles) he nonetheless develops a plan for his survival and
works on it daily. His ingenuity is his making survival in the most difficult
conditions a possibility.
The book
is told in daily journal entries (some days have multiple entries). What feels
like a writing choice by the author is probably a requirement of the kind of
story Weir is telling. It’s full of speculative uses of existing or near-future
technology. As such, it’s advanced stuff and he needs a way to convey the
complexity of the science to his readers. If you can’t be engaged in the
science at work in The Martian than
you can’t be engaged in the story. Because Watney is building a lot of the
tools required for his survival and he’s using tools built by NASA in ways they
weren’t intended on being used, Weir had to explain several things, such as how
the NASA developed equipment work, how
Watney is modifying it, and generally explaining a lot of things to the reader.
Some of those things are very complex and few readers would be able to
understand them in great detail (including me). This posed a particular problem
for Weir which is to explain specific applications of science in general terms
that layman readers could understand and absorb.
The
journal entries allow for this kind of info dump to happen in a way that is
less intrusive than if it was done by a narrator. It gives Watney the
opportunity to explain to potential, readers (fictional readers from the book
included) how he survived. It also served as a distraction for Watney. For
Weir, it gave him a way to develop a character without being able to rely on
things like conversations with other characters. A lot of Watney’s character is
presented in his writing. A lot has been written about his particular kind of
dark humour which he uses as a survival tool. Being faced with constant
setbacks, screw ups, a few explosions and decompressions, not to mention a lot
of psychological trauma, his ability to laugh became another survival tool. Not
to mention, it probably played an important role in keeping him sane during his
time on Mars.
What I
liked the most about the journal entry format is that it allowed Weir to write
very technical descriptions and step-by-step processes without being as dry as
something akin to a user’s manual. Admittedly some parts of the book are very
dry, but having most of the technical details conveyed through a character’s
personal filter helped. At least, it did for me. Whether you enjoyed the technical or
specialized knowledge of the book you have to admit that Weir is a skilled
writer when it comes to this sort of text. This and the use of innovative
problem solving using the limited equipment and resources on Mars are some of the
highlights of the book. The development of the “what if?” scenario is equal
parts fascinating and terrifying, without ever being morbid. I think that the
morbidity is lessened by Watney’s personality and humour.
I’ve
read a few negative appraisals of Watney as a character, specifically his use
of dark humour and sarcasm. Some reviewers at Goodreads mentioned that they
found this humour to be juvenile and demonstrated that Weir, despite his grasp
of the technical manual writing style, is a poor writer. References were made
to overzealous bloggers with limited social skills as well as the juvenile
geekery as seen on television shows such as The
Big Bang Theory. I’m sorry to say that those readers a more than a little
tone-deaf. The use of sarcastic “yays” and “boos” isn’t there to illustrate
some sort of stagnant immaturity on Watney’s part. His humour is a coping
mechanism that contributes to his overall survival. Like the surgeons cracking
jokes in the middle of difficult and bloody surgery on M*A*S*H or Spider-man’s compulsion to crack jokes in the middle of
life threatening battles with supervillains. Mark Watney isn’t an example of
the stereotypical geeks of pop culture, but a stranded astronaut. He’s a scientist
who is well aware of the impossible situation he’s in and he’s trying to deal
with that by writing slightly angry, off-the-cuff comments in his journal. He’s
using science as a mean of surviving physically but he’s uses a daily journal
and jokes (good and bad) as a way of helping himself survive mentally.
While I
have a lot of nice things to say about The
Martian it’s far from a perfect book. It’s blatantly clear that Weir is a
novice writer and even though his first published novel is very skilled in some
ways, there is room for improvement. Two things stood out for me. The first is
that there are changes in writing style. At one point in the book it
inexplicably shifts from the journal entry style to an omniscient narrator for
a few pages. It reads like Weir wrote himself in a corner and the best idea he
had to get out of it was a change in style. I have no issues at all with the style
shifts during the chapters set on Earth, but the narrator shift in the last
quarter of the book was odd.
My
biggest criticism though is the last few paragraphs. Here, Weir awkwardly and
clumsily tacks on a theme about humanity’s universal concern for his fellow man.
I have no problem at all with the theme, just the way that it was included. You
would think that a character spending almost two years in complete isolation
would have had plenty of time to think about this sort of thing in his daily
journal. This is the kind of book that has a lot of potential for this kind of
thematic message. It’s almost there on every page of the book. It’s incredible
what we will do, the effort we will make, to survive. Collectively, it’s almost
frightening to realize how much we will accomplish in order to help even a
single person (and the flip side of that is equally frightening and equally
true). The Martian practically begs
to infuse its story with such rich sub-text. Yet, when it came down to it, the
whole thing is added on the last couple of pages, almost like a side note or a
post script. I don’t have the facts as to how or why those paragraphs were
written but my impression is that Weir saw the potential for it in the text and
rather than rework a few sections in the rest of the book to include this message,
it was slapped on at the end. It reads like a half-assed consideration before
sending the book to press. Maybe it has something to do with the book’s
publication history (it was serialized on Weir’s website, published as an
ebook, and finally getting the hardcover treatment). I don’t know the reason behind
it, but it irks me.
Even with
its flaws The Martian is an
impressive debut. It harkens back to the tradition of hard science fiction, but
what I loved the most about it is the scientist as hero. It’s something we see
too little of in our mainstream fiction. Certainly you can find this hero is
many science fiction books, but it’s not something you usually see in huge
bestsellers with a movie adaptation schedule for release. I like my action
heroes, but we have so many of them already. It’s refreshing to see a single
man like Watney focused on his career and being able to survive in an
incredibly hostile environment using his hands and his brain and anything that
happens to be lying around. He’s space MacGyver! Watney is brave as hell and
he’s forced to take on plenty of risks in the name of survival and problem
solving. But he’s intelligent and applies science as his main tool for staying
alive and finding a way back to Earth. I’m not suggesting that science heroes
should replace action heroes. I’m simply celebrating a different type of hero.
A few
weeks ago I celebrated the audacity of Ursula K. LeGuin’s use of heroism in
everyday life as one of the subjects of her novel Tehanu. Astronaut Mark Watney is another kind of hero. The men and
women of NASA and the crew aboard the Hermes
are all different types of heroes and we don’t often see them in books that get
his level of publicity and fame. Best of all, Weir managed to make Watney’s
time on Mars a riveting, edge-of-your-seat read. He also managed to make it
funny and very informative. I’m still surprised at the success of such a
combination and I’m extremely curious to see if Weir will continue writing.
He’s got my attention now and I hope he continues to surprise me.
No comments:
Post a Comment