It has been a long
time since I wrote about Robert E. Howard’s Conan. I’ve been meaning to write
stuff for the blog more often this year. If you’re reading this in 2020 you
know the kind of year we’ve had. If you’re reading this from sometime in the future,
then I would like to apologize from bringing up the horrors we went through.
Suffice to say that
it’s been too long since my last time hanging out with the Cimmerian. Long ago
my goal was to read all of the Conan
stories written by Howard and write something about each one as I go along.
Unfortunately, since writing about each story requires time and effort, the
project stalled a few years ago. Recently, I’ve been taken by the Conan bug
again (lucky for me it wasn’t another altogether dangerous bug, yes more
dangerous than Conan) and decided it was a good idea to give this another go.
Another reason to
pick up this project again is that I’m looking forward to reading Conan in
physical medium. The edition I’ve been reading so far is an ebook compendium of
all of Howard’s Conan stories. I also
have the three-volume set edited by Karl Edward Wagner. It found it randomly in
my local used bookstore and, liking the covers and having always wanted to read
these stories, I picked it up. I didn’t find out about how well-regarded they
are by fans of Howard and Wagner until after I have purchased them. They do not
collect all of the stories, mostly the later ones. I’ve got a three or four
more to read as ebooks before I start reading the Wagner edited volumes. That’s
extra enticement.
“Rogues in the House” by Robert E. Howard
Originally
published in Weird Tales (Jan. 1934)
In an unnamed city,
an aristocrat named Murilo received a threatening message from the Red Priest,
“the real ruler of the city”. Knowing that hard times and likely death will
soon befall him, Murilo decides to go down fighting. Problem is he’s a perfumed
nobleman and his idea of fighting usually takes the form of coins exchanging
hands and using your influence to pressure others into doing you’re dirty work.
Luckily for him, a musclebound Cimmerian was recently imprisoned for doing the
sort of thing Murilo was searching for: beheading someone.
Murilo offers Conan
a bargain. He will orchestrate a jailbreak for Conan in exchange for the Red
Priest’s assassination. Once the job is done he will also pay him in gold,. The
deal is struck. The jailbreak doesn’t go as planned, but Conan still manages to
escape. After going about a bit of his own business, he heads off to the Red
Priest’s domain.
In the dark pits
beneath the Red Priest’s house, Conan encounters Murilo. There is only one
remaining way out through the house, as the way in which Conan snuck in is now
barred. They navigate their way through the tunnels and find the Red Priest
himself. He was overthrown by his intelligent ape-like pet Thak. With help from
the priest, Conan makes his way upstairs to battle with the creature.
Cover of Conan the Barbarian #11 by Barry Windsor-Smith. |
I’ll stop there as
you and I both know how the story ends. That’s a bit of my issue with this
story is that there are not too many surprises as far as the big story beats
are concerned. Having read a few of Howard’s stories by now, there is a clear
pattern that has been set. Anybody who is misusing their powers as a ruler
against Conan will suffer the consequences. Anybody who is perfumed or dabbles
in wizardry and mistreats Conan will suffer the consequences. Anything
resembling a monster or other supernatural creature who, by fate or direct
action, is confronted with Conan will suffer the consequences.
That being said,
knowing where the story will go doesn’t mean it’s not enjoyable. Howard has a
good grasp of Conan at this point and things we are confident will occur do not
happen in the obvious way. There are still surprises to be had.
For starters, this
story breaks part of the plot formula that Howard has been establishing thus
far which boils down evil wizard, damsel in distress, Conan defeats monster and
wizard. There is no damsel in distress. Instead there is a former lover who
mistreats Conan and receive her comeuppance for getting him jailed. As for the monster,
well, it’s not really a monster (see the story’s ending). There are some elements
of Howard’s formula that are included in “Rogues”, but they are not presented
in the same as in previous stories. It’s something we’ve seen before, but
Howard goes much deeper with it in this particular tale.
The rogues in this
story are the civilized men, Nabonidus and Murilo. Both use their power to
control and deceive those around them with the goal of gaining from it. Their
actions are all intended to increase their own wealth and prestige while also
reducing that of their adversaries and those they consider inferior. However,
they are unable to do so with continued success as there is always another opponent
vying for the same wealth and prestige as them. The conflict between themselves
is what drives this particular adventure. The two characters that end this
story are from the other camp. They are the barbarians.
Famous painting of Conan and Thak by Frank Frazetta. |
Enter Conan who
gets involved in the conflict between the Red Priest and Murilo because the
latter hires his help to defeat the former. Conan agrees because he needs help
to get out of his own predicament which so happens to be caused by another
instance of civilized people being real jerks: the priest he beheads for fencing
stolen goods and the woman who sells him out which causes him to be imprisoned.
Howard shows us the
difference in their actions by highlighting the hypocrisy of the civilized
world. Both the Red Priest and Murilo used their positions in the city’s
political and social groups to influence the city’s affairs. They did so with
their own self-interest at heart, but they are not straightforward about it.
They are deceiving and secretive in their actions. The priest whom Conan kills,
leading to his imprisonment, was a fence for stolen merchandise and a police
informant. He wasn’t taking his role seriously, instead he used his title and
position in the community to facilitate crooked dealings in order to enrich
himself at the cost of others’ misfortunes. Dude was asking for it and so are
Murilo and Nabonidus, though Conan seems to have a bit more trust for Murilo,
possibly because he behaves with a bit more honestly. At least he does towards
Conan.
Conan’s honesty
with who he is and what he does, makes him the more honourable character in the
story despite his being a barbarian and an outsider. Compared to the other two
whose duplicitous actions lead them into a ton of trouble, leading them to
request help from Conan, there is no pretense from Conan. While he didn’t ask
for Murilo’s help in breaking out from prison, he did accept Murilo’s price for
orchestrating his escape. Despite the escape not going as planned, enough of it
was genuinely helpful to Conan for him to admit to having benefited from
Murilo’s help. In return, he chooses to deliver his end of their agreement and
proceed to assassinate the Red Priest. He could easily have gone on his way
without fulfilling his end of the bargain, but that’s not who he is.
Interestingly,
Howard gives us another view of civilization versus barbarism with the character
of Thak. It’s more nuanced that what we’ve seen before and it gives the reader something
to think about. Thak is not human, but he’s not quite a monster either. He is
ape-like and is treated as a pet of sorts by Nabonidus. Thak takes control of
Nabonidus’s home and tosses him in the underground pits. He proceeds to
impersonate his former master, including donning his red cloak. He’s
intelligent enough to observe Nabonidus’s behaviour and learn to copy it, but
not enough to behave fully human. He poses as a man, but isn’t one
Trapped in the house with the original Red Priest and Murilo, Conan must defeat Thak in order to make his escape. He manages to defeat him with some help from Murilo, showing just how mighty Thak’s physical strength is. Thak is savagery posing as civility. It’s in this way that Conan contrasts Thak and consequently reminder readers what makes Conan the hero of these stories. He represents the good aspects of civilization (intelligence and application of shared knowledge) but also the strength and occasional savagery of a barbarian. Thak has one (physical strength and self-determinism), but only a corrupted version of the other (the Red Priest’s version of civilization).
Conan is a
barbarian in the way he rejects the more frivolous and status seeking aspects
of civilization, yet he is not barbaric in thought. His action can appear
barbaric in comparison to the more genteel behaviour of so-called civilized
individuals, but that’s only because he is more honest about his action which makes
them easier to see for what they truly are. He is direct and doesn’t hide his
true intentions behind a façade of deceit. Thak is intelligent enough to copy,
but not enough to understand the meaning of his actions. Despite it all, Conan
feels remorse over having killed Thak as he could recognize that his negative
behaviour was a result his captor’s teachings and not something innate.
“Rogues in the House”
gives us examples of civilization corrupted (the fence priest, the prostitute that
sells out Conan, and Nabonidus) and counters it against a tragic barbarian “monster”
that was corrupted by civilization and Conan, the ideal barbarian who believes
in just action. Howard also includes Murilo who is clearly in the camp of corrupted
civilized man, but also shows some good characteristics in his personal
interactions with Conan. There are some juicy character dynamics in this story
which make up for the straightforward plot.
I have not read any
of the comic book adaptations of this story, so I won’t comment on those. I did
think of the wizard from the Conan the
Destroyer movie. The one who takes on the shape of an ape and fights Conan
with mirror magic. It’s an ape in a red cape, how am I not supposed to think
about it? Man, I love that movie so much. I might be the only Conan fan that
does.
Ranking: 4 Big Red Cloaks. Good ideas executed with skill and style.
What appears at
first to be a simple and straightforward story, actually contains some complex
elements. Both in the characters interactions, but also in their motivations,
some of which are not clearly explained. There’s a lot of room for
interpretation of both the action in the story and its thematic meaning. If you
take your time to savour the story and engage with it, there’s plenty to enjoy
while reading “Rogues in the House”.
No comments:
Post a Comment