Understanding Comics was written and drawn by Scott McCloud and
it’s an excellent analysis of the comics medium. At first, Understanding Comics can seem like an unnecessary endeavour. What’s
so difficult about comics that warrants a whole book be written on it? Aren’t
comics just garishly coloured superhero stories where people wearing long
underwear beat each other over the head? Of course not everybody thinks this
way but many people still do and McCloud addresses this. More importantly, he
also addresses long time comics readers and that’s part of the strength of this
comic.
Understanding Comics is very close to universal in its appeal to
potential readers because it doesn’t focus on the analysis of specific comics,
classic or otherwise (unless it’s to illustrate a point). McCloud opts for an
analysis of the form of storytelling that is the comic book. He doesn’t limit
himself to genre or specific creators. He doesn’t even limit himself to the
geographical belongings of certain works. He uses American comics, European
comics and Japanese manga to illustrate many of the different topics his
discuses in his book and it results in two different effects. The first is
providing a very wide definition of what comics are, thus showing new readers
that comic book are not limited to superheroes or other genre stories. The second
is providing long time readers of comics many new works to explore. I had a
quite a bit of fun spotting references and characters in McCloud’s background
or in the charts. I particularly enjoyed seeing Arale from Akira Toriyama’s Dr. Slump manga, one of the funniest
manga (or comics, for that matter) that I’ve ever read.
McCloud’s
analysis of the comics medium was both very broad and, at times, very in depth
and specific. He clearly had a lot of other ideas in his head since he
published a second book, Reinventing
Comics, a few years after this one. His subjects of analysis were many and
included visual iconography, reader participation (especially in between
panels), the structure and effects of combining words and pictures, the
visualization of time and movement, the artistic effects of different styles
and colouring palettes as well as the creative process of comics. The most
interesting parts for me were in the chapter analyzing how words and picture
can combine to transfer information more successfully than either words or pictures
separately. His understanding of artistic techniques and their effects of the
participation of the reader are nothing short of revelatory.
The comic isn’t
without its faults, however. McCloud starts off completely on the wrong foot.
He wants people to accept comic as the superb art form he believes it to be but
he’s unrefined in his arguments and the whole section reeks of desperation.
McCloud seems to be arguing with defenders of literary works, high art and
cinema while using an “I’m as good as you are” argument. I think it’s more
effective to lead the readers to conclude for themselves that comics are as
worthy of attention and praise than any other form of storytelling. Bashing the
reader over the head with a heavy handed approach will only result in
alienating your reader.
Another fault of
Understanding Comics isn’t that big a
fault at all. This is a work of a young man and a young comics creator. If you
look at it from a certain perspective, it actually makes Understanding Comics that much more impressive and McCloud that
much more worthy of praise. From time to time, there was a clunky bit of
execution or dialogue but despite McCloud’s age at the time, he had big ideas
and he had a lot of ambition. Both of those things can easily be found within
these pages and close to twenty years after its initial publication, it still
has a lot of weight to it. The comic has aged pretty well.
I’ll always be
impressed as to how clearly McCloud shared his thoughts and analysis of comics.
I didn’t agree with everything he said, and that’s perfectly fine. McCloud was
even aware that everything he was saying wasn’t necessarily going to be taken
as fact and he even encourages readers not to. He states that his goal with Understanding Comics was to promote
discussion of comics in more intelligent circles.
Understanding Comics was clearly and ambitious project for
McCloud but he succeeded. It’s ambitious in its subject matter and in its
executions but it delivers. That’s what makes it so good and that’s what makes
it so enduring as a work of critical analysis.
No comments:
Post a Comment