Jeph Loeb and Tim
Sale have done a lot of work together. I’ve had the pleasure of reading a lot
of their collaborations (though not all) and I’ve enjoyed them to varying
degrees. The more recent book of theirs that I’ve read is Superman for All Seasons and I really like it.
I was expecting
something similar to what he did at Marvel with their origins stories for Daredevil and Hulk. That’s not exactly it. It’s also different
form their work on Batman which focuses, more or less, on telling mysteries set
Gotham that used many of the main cast of characters from Batman stories. Superman for All Seasons begins with
Clark Kent’s late adolescence and tells the story of his first few years as
Superman. It’s not an origin story, not really. Nobody even mentions Krypton.
It’s more of a story about Superman
than a Superman story. I’ll do my best to explain that but let’s backtrack a
little.
I’m not a huge
fan of origin stories but hey are necessary to have for characters that live in
a serialized medium like comic books. Knowing a character’s backstory, their
very beginnings, helps to define a character. It gives them motivation and it
helps the reader better understand why a character does what they do. The
problem I have with origin stories is that some people feel it’s important to retell
them over and over again. Reimagined origins or retelling with the purpose of
focusing on a specific aspect of the character that was at best loosely defined
before or at worst tacked on to the character later on in order to modernize
them or make them more accessible to a new generation of readers. Personally I
think it’s annoying as hell to have new original stories for some of the most
popular superhero characters every few years. Batman and Superman have probably
had more versions told of their origin stories than any other superhero
characters.
I haven’t read Superman for All Seasons until now
because I thought it was going to be another original story. I gave in because
I felt like reading a Superman story and I hadn’t read this one yet but mostly
I picked it up because of Tim Sale’s art which I really like. I like the way he
draws Clark Kent and Superman. He convincingly makes them look like different
individuals without giving them different body shapes or giving one different
physical attributes than the other. His Clark Kent is wide and solid looking.
He’s big but Sale gives him delicate features which makes him boyishly handsome
while also giving him an air of friendliness and approachability. He
convincingly illustrates the alter egos of Clark and Superman. Clark wears
clothing that is a little loose which retains his bulky look without giving him
muscular definition. His glasses accentuate his innocence and friendliness.
When he’s Superman, his costume is tight, which serves well to show off his
muscles which immediately gives him a strong presence. Without his glasses his
eyes are drawn to be very squinty but it’s done in a way as to make him more
threatening. This doesn’t always work because his features are still drawn
rather small for the size of his body, particularly his face, but in doing so
Sale maintains an air of approachability while also giving him a bit more
menace (he’s a crime fighter after all).
Sale didn’t
disappoint with his work on this book. It helps that Bjarne Hansen did a
wonderful job with the colouring. The entire book is given a classy painterly
look. The colour palette is nuanced and soft but it does so without becoming
lifeless, stiff or muddy. Sale’s art is usually very clear, even when he uses a
lot of black shapes. With Superman, compared to his Batman work, there are very
few pages with heavy inks. Instead there are clear lines, well defined shapes
but it’s Hansen that gives the art its depth. He grounds the characters into
the background and he helps to sell the double-page spreads throughout the book
of which there are many. One of the tricks Hansen did in the comic that I like
was using slightly flatter colours for the superheroic elements of the story,
like Superman’s costume or Lex Luthor’s robots. The bright colours contrast
with the painted colours used throughout the book and the effect is to make all
the superhero stuff leap off the page. It’s quite a pleasant and effective
colouring technique.
While the art was
good, even better than I was expecting, partly because of Hansen’s colouring,
the story is what made this comic so damn good. I previously said that this
comic isn’t a Superman story, it’s a story specifically about him and that’s
the great idea that gives the comic its thematic weight and separates it from
so many other Superman comics.
People say that
Superman is different from other super heroes because his “real” identity is
that of his super-powered identity, not his human identity. I think that
depends on who is writing Superman. Some people say there are two types of
Superman stories: those that focus on the man and those that focus on the
super. I would say that this particular story focuses on the man. In writing Superman for All Seasons Loeb focuses on
the man, specifically he focuses on the idea that Clark Kent becomes the hero
of Metropolis because of the nurturing and care given to him by Jonathan and
Martha Kent who found him in a rocket ship when he was still a baby. With this
comic, Loeb argues that its nurture, not nature, that helped shaped Clark into
a heroic figure. By doing so, he’s also clearly establishing his Superman story
as one of those that focuses specifically with the man.
As you might have
guessed from the title, Superman for All
Seasons is divided into four chapters, each one dealing with a particular
season. Each chapter is also narrated by an individual close to either Clark or
Superman. The narrators and chapter pairings are: Spring/Jonathan Kent,
Fall/Lois Lane, Summer/Lex Luthor and Winter/Lana Lang. The Spring and Winter
chapters focus on Clark and how the emergence of his superpowers have affected
him and the people from Smallville that are closest to him. The Summer and Fall
chapters focus on the Superman identity and how it has affected the city of
Metropolis and some of its key individuals. I think that the Spring and Winter
chapters are the highlights of this book as Loeb succeeds to make Clark’s
fantastic emotional turmoil relatable and believable.
Loeb makes his
themes and his approach to Superman’s story quite clear in the first issue. In
a scene beginning with Clark and Lana are walking around in Smallville the
narration by Pa Kent reads:
Sometimes, when the corn was planted, it shot up to soon. / The roots
hadn’t taken hold, so the stalk couldn’t support its own weight. / The corn
would turn sour. / I don’t know if Clark knew how lucky he was growing up in a
place like Smallville.
The narrator is
comparing a stalk of corn to Clark. Being raised in a small town like
Smallville has given Clark the time to set down roots and to become morally
grounded. Doing so will make him stronger later in life after he’s “shot up”.
The analogy here is likely making reference to moral roots, being raised in a
small town has given Clark a specific perspective on life. It’s immaterial and
doesn’t focus on financial wealth. Instead, it focuses on family, being kind to
others, and finding happiness in small comforts. There is also a link with
Clark’s emotional maturity and the development of his powers. It’s telling that
his superpowers emerge at the end of his teenage years. By that time in his
life he’s already learned the lessons that will guide him in using his power in
a responsible way. Certainly there is a learning curve but for the most part
the foundation was strong and so he eventually learns how far he will go in
using his powers.
Another clue as
to what this narration can means can be found in Sale’s dedication in the trade
paperback. “For Norman Rockwell and his love of a vision of Americana that
resonates through its limitations” Many of Rockwell famous paintings and
illustrations highlight a simple way of life. His work is underpinned by core
American values which were often sentimental and idealistic. He offered a
vision of America that was simple yet complex, evocative, and thoughtful.
While it’s not
stated in the text as a part of this story, I also like to think of limitations
as being an integral part of Superman. As a being that is so incredibly
powerful he’s constantly a danger to normal people around him. Losing his
temper could accidentally result in large scale destruction and potentially
thousands of deaths. How does he interact with the rest of humanity when he’s
Clark Kent? In order to function normally he has to suppress his impressive
gifts. Many of Superman’s limitations are self-imposed. Limitations in the use
of his power, both in what he is willing to do with them and in how much
strength he uses in everyday situations. He does this in order to prevent himself
from abusing his powers and hurting others.
This brings us back
to his Clark Kent identity and the idea that Superman is his “true” identity. I
completely disagree with this idea of a “true” identity. Superman is a complex
character and you could argue that Clark Kent has existed far longer than
Superman. Superman is a construct of Clark’s that allows him to use his powers
while maintaining a life in which he can, as Clark, live like a man. This is
another form of self-imposed limitation because it shows that Clark is not
willing to fully embrace, on a permanent basis, the identity of Superman. He
wants to maintain his connection to humanity and the best way to do that is to
continue being part of humanity. Clark lives a human life in order to
continuously provide his Superman identity with moral and intellectual guidance.
Loeb and Sale wanted to write a Superman story that lent itself well to
large panels, many double-page spreads. They certainly succeed at that. The
large panels and the overall decompressed aspect of the writing and the art
really help to give this story resonance. Superman
for All Seasons is a contemplative work and by keeping the focus tightly on
Clark’s development into his new identity as the hero of Metropolis the creative team succeeds at giving their
book the thematic resonance they were attempting to achieve. I particularly
liked the use of narrators that gave an outsider’s point of view of Clark’s
struggle in cementing his identity as Superman.
No comments:
Post a Comment